Property, infrastructure and energy
Develop existing assets, technology and use together.
PERCEL connects owner objectives, technical reality, commercial viability, approvals and later operation into a sound decision and project structure.
Typical starting points
When an asset raises more than one specialist question.
- A site or portfolio needs a new use or investment perspective.
- Supply, refurbishment and ongoing operation need to be considered together.
- PV, geothermal energy, storage or a new energy concept needs technical and commercial assessment.
- Data-centre or other alternative uses need early qualification before detailed planning begins.
- Planners, engineers, authorities, operators and owners are not yet working from the same target picture.
- Responsibility should remain intact through development, handover and later operation.
What PERCEL takes on
Turn separate contributions into a steerable development.
The core capability lies in the wider context: PERCEL clarifies the actual decision, makes options comparable and leads the disciplines towards one shared objective.
- structure the existing asset, data and assumptions
- pre-qualify use and development options
- compare technical, commercial and organisational routes
- structure investment logic and priorities
- lead planners, engineers and other specialists
- assess approvals, funding and deliverability
- connect phases, handovers and operating requirements
- prepare decisions for management
- maintain the owner or operator perspective over time
Clear roles
PERCEL does not replace specialist planning. PERCEL leads how it works together.
Architects, engineers, energy advisers, assessors and operators remain responsible for their specialist contribution. PERCEL makes sure those contributions do not sit beside each other, but support the same decision and later operating reality.
Suitable specialists are brought in according to the task. PERCEL structures the assignment, interfaces and approvals, checks compatibility and keeps use, technology, commercial viability and the owner objective connected across the development stages.
The mandate is therefore neither facility management nor another planning discipline. It is the overall leadership of a project whose quality only emerges when its parts work together.
Site transformation
Four buildings translated into a sound energy and infrastructure roadmap.
For a high-technology park, existing supply, geothermal energy, the energy centre, heating, cooling, electrical systems, building automation and continuous laboratory operation were brought together in a multi-year programme.
Options, dependencies and costs were developed to design-planning level. The project was later stopped for economic reasons – while the decision basis remained complete and robust.
Read the site casePortfolio and energy
Test the potential before assumptions turn into investment.
More than 30 property entries were reassessed for PV potential from both a technical and commercial perspective. In another portfolio, current use trends and long-term operating models were pre-qualified for 25 assets.
Owner project
Distinct individual projects follow the same logic.
For an international owner mandate, location, architecture, building services, interior and exterior, local partners, delivery and later use were led as one connected system.
The relevant measure is not project size, but whether many contributions need to remain aligned with one shared objective.
Read the owner mandateAsset or site?